The terminal decline of the Nanny state.

by admin on May 13, 2010

Like a profligate footballer’s wife, the nanny state never had quite enough Hermes Birkin bags. There was always one more, a new colour, a new design.

Nu-Labour purchases weren’t handbags, they were assumptions of responsibility. They have cost the country dearly.

Your ears stick out? No need to grow your hair long, no need to find a partner who finds ears like cauliflowers attractive. No need to pay a plastic surgeon. Nu-Labour would pay him for you and give you counselling, and pay you whilst you are out of work…It’s your right isn’t it, isn’t that what we have an NHS for?

Your cat is stuck up a tree? No need to find a ladder, no need to chat up your more agile neighbour, no need to worry about the cat out all night. Nu-Labour would send round your friendly fire brigade free of charge to rescue the cat. It’s your right isn’t it?

Don’t speak a word of English, can’t figure out which line is the amount you have to pay on your gas bill? No need to ask your brother who does speak English, no need to sit down with a dictionary. Nu-Labour would pay for your gas bill to be printed in Inuit, Urdu or Esperanto.

Can’t figure out how to use a computer? No need to read the instructions, why sweat over the ‘Word for Dummies’ edition. Nu-Labour would pay for you to go on a course to make it simple for you.

But now the credit cards have been cut up, and there can be no more spending, the vultures, fresh from gorging on Greece, are eyeing up the UKs debt mountain and feasting on our bonds.

It will have a curious effect, one that the electorate couldn’t achieve, of turning our Government into one that espouses Libertarian values. They will have no choice. They may label themselves Conservative or Lib-Dem at the moment; there may be talk of ‘our manifesto commitments’ but they will have no choice other than to butt out of our lives except for the essentials.

They have to make savage cuts. They cannot cut benefits, theoretically those on benefits are already teeting on the edge of starvation – though they might usefully cut the cost of supplying Sky TV to those households. Telling those on benefits that they must get out and find a job is not a realistic proposition in a recession – though I wonder why I could not find a single person at Stanstead airport who did not speak with an east European accent. Not the hostesses, not the tannoy announcers, not the coffee bar staff, not the cleaners. Are there no English unemployed in the region of Stanstead? Still, nothing the government can do now about the flood of hard working, bright and personable Europeans who have flooded into our country. Too late. The Lisbon treaty has been signed.

So no effective cuts in the unemployed or the benefit bill.

They could devalue our currency, and take something back from the conscientious that have saved for retirement – but it wouldn’t be enough to dent that debt mountain.

They can’t trim the NHS of things like treatment for cardiac arrest, or childbirth.

They could tax those who have held onto their jobs at a higher rate, but they have to be careful that they don’t tip the balance into unemployment.

They could try to cut public sector pay and benefits, but they know that a gleeful outgoing Nu-Labour cabal will do everything they can to encourage strikes and disruption to the country, so they are unlikely to try to claw too much back from that sector.

No, the only thing they can really do is to cut out the myriad ways in which the government has taken to thinking and acting on our behalf over things that we could do for ourselves.

We will have to get our own cat out of the tree, translate the gas bill unaided, and live with our sticky out ears. Grow vegetables in the back garden instead of spending money on patio heaters. The Lesbian drop in centre for one-eyed Somalian’s will have to go. No longer will an ambulance arrive to take you to hospital to get your toenails cut because you find the bus ‘difficult’, and you’re too fat to reach your toes. Buy some long handled sheers, or ask a friend.

The UK has grown fat and profligate, our expectations of what should be done for us by the government has grown exponentially since the end of the last war. The slightest hurdle in our lives and we scream for help. Entire stations full of firemen have been known to spend the day searching for one small kitten that has wedged itself behind the kitchen panelling – somebody has to pay for that, and we take it for granted that not only should it not be us, but it never crosses our mind to rip out the panelling ourselves if the cat bothers us that much.

We will have to take personal responsibility for ourselves. We may even have to rip out the panelling so that we can catch the cat for supper. Who knows how bad it will get? People have survived before without a Nanny state.

We’ll all be Libertarians by the time that debt is paid off. It doesn’t matter what label we liked to have when times were good.  That includes Cameron and Clegg.

That’s the death rattle of the Nanny state you can hear.

{ 47 comments }

1 Alan May 13, 2010 at 15:32

They have to make savage cuts. They cannot cut benefits, theoretically those on benefits are already teeting on the edge of starvation

2 Vimes May 13, 2010 at 15:44

Hmm – let me think. What is going to cost around

3 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 15:50

Face it Vimes – you couldn’t be MP for the nuclear free zone of Sheffield and not support cutting Trident. Whether he will be quite so idealistic in government is another matter.

4 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 15:54

If anybody’s post is not appearing, and they suspect that it might be going into the spam folder – could you e-mail me on annaraccoon@gmail.com.
I have a brilliant spam filter that works well, and usually I check it frequently to make sure that no one has gone in there by mistake – but ever since I wrote that blog post ‘Gordon the Impotent’ I have been flooded with spam for viagra – around 250 so far today alone, and it is getting tiresome to check though it all – so I’m not going to any more, so there!

5 Vimes May 13, 2010 at 15:57

Oh, I think I can guess the answer to that one, Anna – there’s no roof on the house, no food in the fridge and no shoes on the children’s feet, but we still have to buy that nice, shiny, new Bentley, just in case we have to give the Queen a lift to the palace.

6 Thaddeus J. Wilson May 13, 2010 at 17:01

hopefully never going to be used”

You’ve rebutted your own argument, Vimes.

7 Vimes May 13, 2010 at 17:22

Drat – I’d have got away with it, if it hadn’t been for that pesky adverb!

8 Joe Bratley May 13, 2010 at 16:15

Housing Benifit would be a good start with vouchers.
But then the old system worked, but Gorden had to
meddle and now the recipiants can spend it on what
they choose, they do not equate HOUSING BENIFIT
to paying rent. Funny that!

9 Tim Bull May 13, 2010 at 16:18

You don’t really understand the concept of ‘deterrence’ do you Vimes.

Excellent post AR.

10 Vimes May 13, 2010 at 16:42

I understand it fine, Tim – I also think it’s a pile of expensive, unnecessary crap.

11 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 16:58

Vimes,
Remind me not to stand next to you in the event……

12 Vimes May 13, 2010 at 17:02

It’s easy, Anna – you just stand with your legs approximately 3 feet apart, bend over and kiss your arse goodbye. ;-)

13 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 17:07

Vimes,
At my age I’m nowhere near agile enough to do that!

14 JohnRS May 13, 2010 at 17:02

Vimes, I’m sure you understand it but that’s not really relevant is it?

It’s the fact that Kim Jong Il and IveHadMeDinnerDad understand it that’s important.

15 Vimes May 13, 2010 at 17:12

Perhaps someone should tell the Taliban then, as they clearly don’t seem to give a flying one – there again, I would imagine that the gruesome twosome mentioned are far more concerned with their immediate neighbours, than bombing feck out of Faslane. Helensburgh may have its faults, but it’s not that bad.

16 JohnRS May 13, 2010 at 17:03

“That

17 Paul May 13, 2010 at 17:14

I think we need to call in Geldof and Bono, maybe they can start a campaign against First World debt?

18 Old Slaughter May 13, 2010 at 17:18

Masterpiece

19 Gloria Smudd May 13, 2010 at 17:19

Nope. I can’t hear it, no matter how hard I strain my sticky-outs.

20 Thaddeus J. Wilson May 13, 2010 at 18:03

Would you like to borrow my ear trumpet?

21 Gloria Smudd May 13, 2010 at 18:11

My, what a gallant gesture Mr Thaddeus! The age of chivalry is not dead after all. That would be most kind and I promise to wipe it before I give it back.

22 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 18:20

Oh why don’t you two get a room……huh!

23 Thaddeus J. Wilson May 13, 2010 at 20:29

PARDON!?

24 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 18:23

Oh dear, Ms Smudd, that tantilising tempting picture of you seems to have disappeared…..

nb(nothing to do with me folks, it just vanished on its own….)

25 Gloria Smudd May 13, 2010 at 19:27

I had to change my avatar back: I just feel more comfortable without my teeth and with a few tightly-wound curlers keeping my eyebrows up.
Incidentally, my deafness isn’t due to needing my ears syringing but rather to having had my delicate stirrup-bones assaulted by the strains of a new and apparently untuneable ukelele being strummed and twanged with rather more enthusiasm than talent. That’s the last time I buy a child a present they want, I swear….

26 AndrewSouthLondon May 13, 2010 at 17:53

Shopping list found discarded in Pimlico branch of Waitrose:

Advocados
Stop government departmental grants to charities and advocacy groups to lobby government to spend more money.

Fair trade bananas.
Stop giving money we haven’t got to the third world. Close Department of Overeas Development until we can once again afford it.

McKinsey Sauce
Cease all government department commissioning of management consultancy. If you don’t know how to do the job yourself you shouldn’t be in it.

Five a day
Stop all public health based advertising campaigns to persuade us to make healthy choices. We already know the choices.

Mangos
Number of quangos halved each year cumulatively until none remain.

Its not difficult to cut out unhealthy socialist tissue from the body politic. Its painful but we need to save the money – dispense with the anaesthetic.

27 Alan May 13, 2010 at 19:18

“If you don

28 Paul May 13, 2010 at 18:13

I heard today that despite the austerity drive Cameron plans to continue with Gordon’s wonderful cabinet travelling circus at

29 Dave May 13, 2010 at 18:31

Just a word in support of rescuing cats and dogs from tricky situations-drains, iced over ponds etc. These resues are often realistic training opportunities that highlight problems with equipment. They are also the sort of situations that kids and drunks get themselves into.

30 Anna Raccoon May 13, 2010 at 18:38

Dave, I’ve never yet met the drunk that could squeese himself behind the panelling in a kitchen.

31 Pericles May 13, 2010 at 19:35

Anna, you really do need to meet a more divers range of drunks :  may I suggest a rendez-vous ?  I have some friends in Lot et Garonne to whom I owe a visit …

??

32 Ed P May 13, 2010 at 19:09

Hopefully Camelegg will sort out the benefit trap, which makes it uneconomic for those on welfare to take low-paid work.
It’s not the active, hard-working immigrants that are a problem (wherever they come from), but certain East European people (mainly Romanians & Bulgarians) with no skills.
The Lisbon treaty has to be re-ratified in June by all 27 states – a golden opportunity to negotiate with the unelected cabal (& perhaps rescind Darling’s last-ditch vindictive give-away?).

33 Dave May 13, 2010 at 20:30

I reckon they’ve got 100 days before the BBC incites a riot. They’d better get busy. Good post btw.

34 Dick Puddlecote May 13, 2010 at 21:25

Quality piece, Anna, and I do hope you’re correct.

However …

“No longer will an ambulance arrive to take you to hospital to get your toenails cut because you find the bus

35 AndrewSouthLondon May 14, 2010 at 08:10

When your glass is half empty, simply go to the bar and order another half. Surely its not rocket science.

36 Ch May 13, 2010 at 21:35

Very informative and funny for a non-UK-resident …
I personally like very much Mrs Smudd’s personality changes.
To teethe or not to teethe, that’s the curling question :-)

And, almost forget to add: YES, time to end the nanny state – everywhere!

37 Catosays May 13, 2010 at 23:07

I’m totally pissed of with the idle loafers in this country, and believe me there are many in my local town, who seem to think it is their God-given right to get up at noon, scratch their arses, go the pub, go home, sleep it off and then stay up till Christ knows when playing crap music at 9 million decibels, cos it is their ‘uman right’…oh, and fathering squalling brats with not one iota of intelligence

Get wise my scrofulous friends, your time is nigh.

38 Ted Treen May 14, 2010 at 14:03

Would that it were guaranteed, Cato – but we must never underestimate the tenacity of the jobsworth apparatchik in clinging to his/her non-job advising the underclass of their rights but totally failing to instill in them any sense of responsibility.

If we add to that the machiavellian machinations of our esteemed union leaders, whose ambitious megalomanic egos inevitably propel them to seek out any little thing at which they can be outraged, then I feel the quantum shift or paradigm shift necessary to achieve the desired result (i.e. the withering & vanishing of Chavsville) might be rather longer in coming than we hope…

39 William May 14, 2010 at 07:39

“Number of quangos halved each year cumulatively until none remain.”

It will never happen then – but the last one will get smaller and smaller!

40 PT May 14, 2010 at 08:28

In this grossly overcrowded world, and even more grossly overcrowded country, we could do worse than to end the insanity of free fertility treatment on the NHS, and taxing poor people in order to pay benefits to wealthier people to have more children – some make a very good living out of it.

41 Pericles May 14, 2010 at 08:45

I think the coalition already plans to do that, PT

42 Ted Treen May 14, 2010 at 14:28

Pericles,

I’m sure you’re correct when you say “…because there are too few working and paying the taxes from which the pensions are paid…”

However, far too many of these non-workers, whilst not contributing in any way, are further draining public funds by the claiming of every benefit under the sun. It isn’t reducing the rate of procreation generally that is being idealised, just reducing the rate at which professional benefit claimants produce a new generation of benefit claimants.

43 Gary May 15, 2010 at 15:45

grossly over crowded country??

More than 99% of the people of the UK live on less than 1/15 (one fifteenth) of it’s land mass, about 4M acres. About 600,000 people live on 40M acres, and the remaining 15M acres of the UK’s 60M acres is owned by the likes of the national trust and the MOD. There isn’t a shortage of land, we are just herded into small sections of it.

44 PT May 14, 2010 at 10:36

Yes, Pericles, it is a Ponzi, because Government &/or companies, like the fraudsters, raid the funds which should have been invested, treating people’s contributions as their own money. That will have to stop. As will the growth in the population, or the point will be reached, mathematically speaking, when the mass of the human population will equal the mass of planet Earth. An absurd idea obviously – if we do nothing about it, our population will crash through famine, disease and war long before we reach even the maximum mass of the biosphere.

45 bil May 14, 2010 at 13:52

Next door neighbour – hasn’t worked in over a year – his girlfriend works in the petrol station – he claims both are not working – has his rent paid by the government and his mother – hasn’t actually paid it in six months – is being evicted by his landlord – has a council house lined up ready – girlfriend’s just become pregnant again – just had a new 32″ LCD TV delivered.

Where do I begin…

46 Ted Treen May 14, 2010 at 14:31

My first instinct is to say begin with an AK or RPG launcher, but I suppose that would never do in these touchy-feely days…

And it would almost certainly find me up in front of some bewigged buffoon on a charge of incitement. So let me claim the defence of “Satire & irony” immediately.

47 Gary May 15, 2010 at 13:30

We don’t have any manufacturing. Manufacturing was ONLY 20% of our economy back in 1997, and today it is a paltry 9%. So when we sack the nappy coordinators and immigrant outreach workers, what will they do instead? Our real unemployment figure is something like 8 million people. Our economy of the last 10-15 years has been house prices. That is really the only product a bank has. Banks create money as debt, they lend money they never had, they simply write it into your account, and you pay the money back (that never existed before they created it as debt) plus interest. It was great (for some) until we reached the point where no one could afford to service the huge debts required to buy a house any longer. The financial ‘industry’ is now dead. It has no room left to manouvre.

So yes, sack the state workers, but what will they do instead?