POLICE forces across the country are being told to recruit gypsies. Senior officers are so concerned about hitting the new quotas they have been inviting young travellers to their training colleges.
This could be interesting as officers gaze into a crystal ball to see what crimes you may be thinking of committing. Reaction has been mixed, to say the least.
Conservative MP Philip Davies said: “I absolutely despair, this is utter nonsense.
“It should be irrelevant whether police officers are black, white, gay, straight, muslim or Christian, gypsy or not. The only consideration should be whether they are people who can uphold the law without fear or favour.
“Furthermore, this is potentially dangerous because police forces could end up recruiting people who might not be the best people, just to meet their quota.”
Emma Nuttall, a spokeswoman for Friends, Families And Travellers, an organisation that campaigns for the rights of gypsies and travellers, said: “Gypsies get a bad press. We welcome this recruitment plan wholeheartedly.
“We are already in discussion with a number of police forces, including Sussex and Kent.”
On the basis, of ‘takes one to know one’ – we might be advised to support this move, for it does help to have some idea of the mentality of the people you are dealing with……..read this…….HERE in the original French. Or here, translated.
The presence of Gypsies from Romania in the Roubaix area [north of France] has always brought its load of problems, but a new threshold was reached when a difficult arrest was made last Thursday: a young woman grabbed a baby by its foot and used it as a weapon to hit a policeman.
Last Thursday, around 6.30 p.m., a police patrol stops a young man driving without a licence or insurance. [A common practice, it seems, among Gypsies.] […] Tempers flare. Extra police are summoned to the place. Around ten of them are present when the exchange takes an astonishing turn. A young Gypsy grabs a one-year old baby from the arms of a man belonging to the camp. She steps in front of the policemen. The police think she is trying to prevent the arrest by acting as a human shield. Far from it.
First, she grabs the baby by an arm and a leg, and hits a policeman with it. Then, she grabs it by one foot only, and hits again. What’s happening is awful. The baby cries. The police try to hinder this explosion of violence. This baby used as a weapon; it’s unbearable. Then the woman tries to throw the baby on the ground. Policemen manage to catch it before it falls. They rush it away to the hospital, far from this scene of hysteria.
But wait. Other women bare their breasts, and splatter the police with their own milk. One Gypsy man mutilates himself: he slashes his belly with a 20-cm wound. The police provide him with emergency care and press the wound in order to keep the blood from flowing. The baby-swinging woman, who is not the baby’s mother, is brought to the police station. The baby is in a state of shock. An inquest is begun. The baby might be put under the care of a foster family. Legal proceedings have been started for violence and rebellion.
Why such violence? At the football club next door, people are waiting eagerly for the Gypsies’ departure. The situation has been very tense for the last month: “They steal our footballs, they send their children to relieve themselves on the football ground right while we’re training,” says the coach Hassen Hamidi.
People from the neighbourhood have been helpful to Gypsies. But [the Gypsies’] aggressiveness and lack of respect are unbearable.


{ 1 trackback }
{ 22 comments… read them below or add one }
A Gypsy caravan is just anarchy in motion.
Let’s ask Emma Nuttall why she thinks.. “Gypsies get a bad press”
Why does the phrase
“..poachers becoming gamekeepers..” keep coming into my mind?
Gypsies get a bad press because, basically, they are thieving pikey scum.
I’ve seen too many of their camps to think otherwise.
Anna, what is the french translation of “thieving, pikey scum”?
Les MP’s de Anglaterre.
Very apt, Saul.
“The baby cries”
it’s a bit stronger than that, Anna: “hurler”. It would sooner be translated with “bellow with pain” than “cry”, I think.
Absolutely shocking someone can do that.
Had a long conversation this morning with a friend about how people can react, what they can do under certain circumstances. She may be right that most of us cannot imagine how other human beings can behave so differently from our own …
That’s a 10- for Saul. It is Angleterre.
Oh, you sophisticats, with your knowledge of languages.
I did try and learn a bit of Russian at one point, for the visit to St. Petersburg.
Che pevoo, spaceboo.
Dosvadania, comrades.
Tommorrow is another battle.
I think it’s worth pointing out it’s not the genetic ID which dictates this behavior, and you’d be wise to link it to “traveller” not “gypsy”.
Travellers have a tradition of thieving, selling drugs and extreme anti-social behavior which is part of the lifestyle.
Gypsy’s are an ethnic group. All travellers are generally scumbags, many gypsies are travellers, but this does not mean all Gypsies are scumbags.
Gypsies have brought some of the worlds finest art and music to the world e.g. Django Reinheardt, and have their own tiered class system like here.
It’s like using an unemployed scouse criminal family and shouting “all english are scumbags”!!
I hear that Gordon Brown, on the last day of parliament, is due to announce 500,000 new places for people to train to be gypsies. He’s ‘really’ getting on with the job!
Gypsies are sub-human – Hitler was right to put them in concentration camps!
That is precisely what the Parole Board does, looks into a crystal ball to see if the prisoner will commit a crime in the future…
Good comment jailhouse, point well made.
Gypsy parole boards…….
“Nearly Headless Nick July 21, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Gypsies are sub-human – Hitler was right to put them in concentration camps!”
Dear Ms Raccoon,
How on earth can you leave such a comment on your fantastic blog !!! This comment is a disgrace. YOUR MODERATION AND EDITING IS NEEDED HERE URGENTLY
Some French, unlike “the fortunate Brits”, know what it means “concentration camps”…no need to go very past in history…my country has been through hell and trauma because of this horrible H and its compatriots !!!
Valerie.
Valerie,
I totally disagree with the comment too – but I don’t delete comments simply becasue I disagree with them.
If you look at the page headed ‘Satirical News comment’, you will see:
This web site is moderated to remove libel, naturally; but also moderated to remove brain dead comments like ‘First’, or foul mouthed rants that contain no humour or relationship to the current news. I don’t remove comments on the grounds of disagreeing with the commentator’s opinion. I like opposing views, they are a positive thing – it’s called debate!
The answer is not to pretend that people don’t hold such views, by sweeping them under the carpet, out of sight, but to rebut their views with intelligent debate. Quite often people put comments like that up merely to enrage other people, or to engage them in debate.
Anna R – I wish your policy would rub off on Labourlist – they moderate based on “dissent” as well as “offence”.
Dear Ms Raccoon,
“I like opposing views, they are a positive thing – it’s called debate!”
Sorry, I will carry on for a minute…Just to mention that Mr Headless’ comment constitutes an “Incitation a la haine raciale” and yes it is legally a crime in France and is punished as such.
“I don’t remove comments on the grounds of disagreeing with the commentator’s opinion.”
It is very true we would really have missed such a great contribution from his part !!!
” Quite often people put comments like that up merely to enrage other people, or to engage them in debate.”
It is like on the kids playground if I do understand properly !!!
Happy and sunny Afternoon and I will carry on reading your interesting views.
Valerie
Yes, Valerie, had he said ‘Romany’ I would have agreed with you – but there is not a ‘Gypsy’ race……..
I fully subscribe to Anna’s moderating policy. Although I fear that Nearly [?] Headless Nick falls in the category “enrage”, this policy is an invitation to “engage” and provide the supporting facts, which lead him/her to forming this exclamation-mark-opinion.
No supporting facts?
OK.
Off to the silken sheets.
Good night