<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last remaining incandescent Rosbif writes&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/</link>
	<description>A jaundiced view of the mainstream media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11471</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11471</guid>
		<description>I have used Gmail for some years, but primarily as a secure server for my ordinary email client, Mozilla Thunderbird. (https sending &amp; receiving).
Basically this means that you use your ordinary email program on your PC to compose, send &amp; receive emails, but instead of using your IPS&#039;s POP &amp; SMTP mail servers, you use Gmail&#039;s. It&#039;s free and has the benefit that Gmail retains &quot;in the cloud&quot; copies of your received and sent correspondence should you lose your local copies.
The only very slight downside I may  mention is that as your mail is received &amp; sent using https servers, your anti-virus can&#039;t scan it on the fly. (Well, that&#039;s the point of https, isn&#039;t it - nothing can get into it?). Nasties will be detected on execution or opening, so it&#039;s not a real problem. Gmail also has its own anti-virus scanning as an extra layer of protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Gmail for some years, but primarily as a secure server for my ordinary email client, Mozilla Thunderbird. (https sending &amp; receiving).<br />
Basically this means that you use your ordinary email program on your PC to compose, send &amp; receive emails, but instead of using your IPS&#8217;s POP &amp; SMTP mail servers, you use Gmail&#8217;s. It&#8217;s free and has the benefit that Gmail retains &#8220;in the cloud&#8221; copies of your received and sent correspondence should you lose your local copies.<br />
The only very slight downside I may  mention is that as your mail is received &amp; sent using https servers, your anti-virus can&#8217;t scan it on the fly. (Well, that&#8217;s the point of https, isn&#8217;t it &#8211; nothing can get into it?). Nasties will be detected on execution or opening, so it&#8217;s not a real problem. Gmail also has its own anti-virus scanning as an extra layer of protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabba the Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabba the Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11418</guid>
		<description>Get a normal pop3 account, a proper email client and stop whining...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get a normal pop3 account, a proper email client and stop whining&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Collyer</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11409</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Collyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11409</guid>
		<description>But people who use Google like their whimsical ways, and their cute logos that change every day. Some of them even believe that Google aren&#039;t out to make money. In fact, I&#039;ve heard rumours that some Google lovers even claim that Google support open source, and aren&#039;t motivated by the idea of becoming the next Microsoft dollar-press.

Ha ha ha ha.

Try Hotmail or Yahoo mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But people who use Google like their whimsical ways, and their cute logos that change every day. Some of them even believe that Google aren&#8217;t out to make money. In fact, I&#8217;ve heard rumours that some Google lovers even claim that Google support open source, and aren&#8217;t motivated by the idea of becoming the next Microsoft dollar-press.</p>
<p>Ha ha ha ha.</p>
<p>Try Hotmail or Yahoo mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john ward</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11406</link>
		<dc:creator>john ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11406</guid>
		<description>The author writes:

(1) One can&#039;t export lists from  Outlook to Gmail: on their own admission, they don&#039;t &#039;accept&#039; them. Something to do with them not, um, liking Microsoft very much.
(2) Nothing Google do is &#039;free&#039;: the price is merely hidden.  Ollie Letwin&#039;s initial view was also &#039;you get what you pay for&#039; - but after investigating, he changed it.
(3) As the comment threads in the Chateau D&#039;If clearly show, there is a software fault in gmail bcc....and has been for years. The comments are full of tricks to get round the problem -  but this is pure Gulliver stuff.  &#039;Why not just get Google to solve it?&#039; you ask: because you can&#039;t. Pigeon, letter, email, telephone: das ist strengstens verboten, Mensch!
(4) I changed from paid-for Orange because they restricted me to ten recipients per mail...a subtle attempt to change themselves into pay-more-for-Orange.
(5) Next time I will indeed have backups: but why should I have to assume that all big-business technology will be crap?
(6) The main opinion in the piece is that sectioning the customer is not really a form of service: it&#039;s what the Soviet Union used to do with dissidents.
Sorry to go a bit Stephen Fry about this folks, but I think I&#039;m beginning to see why Google will continue to get away with taking the piss....
Grump, grump.
YM x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author writes:</p>
<p>(1) One can&#8217;t export lists from  Outlook to Gmail: on their own admission, they don&#8217;t &#8216;accept&#8217; them. Something to do with them not, um, liking Microsoft very much.<br />
(2) Nothing Google do is &#8216;free&#8217;: the price is merely hidden.  Ollie Letwin&#8217;s initial view was also &#8216;you get what you pay for&#8217; &#8211; but after investigating, he changed it.<br />
(3) As the comment threads in the Chateau D&#8217;If clearly show, there is a software fault in gmail bcc&#8230;.and has been for years. The comments are full of tricks to get round the problem &#8211;  but this is pure Gulliver stuff.  &#8216;Why not just get Google to solve it?&#8217; you ask: because you can&#8217;t. Pigeon, letter, email, telephone: das ist strengstens verboten, Mensch!<br />
(4) I changed from paid-for Orange because they restricted me to ten recipients per mail&#8230;a subtle attempt to change themselves into pay-more-for-Orange.<br />
(5) Next time I will indeed have backups: but why should I have to assume that all big-business technology will be crap?<br />
(6) The main opinion in the piece is that sectioning the customer is not really a form of service: it&#8217;s what the Soviet Union used to do with dissidents.<br />
Sorry to go a bit Stephen Fry about this folks, but I think I&#8217;m beginning to see why Google will continue to get away with taking the piss&#8230;.<br />
Grump, grump.<br />
YM x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11405</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11405</guid>
		<description>Anna,
Beware of &#039;web experts&#039; because they are just experts and usually follow the definition I coined in the 60s and yes I am one.

Expert: x is the unknown quantity and a spert is a drip under pressure.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna,<br />
Beware of &#8216;web experts&#8217; because they are just experts and usually follow the definition I coined in the 60s and yes I am one.</p>
<p>Expert: x is the unknown quantity and a spert is a drip under pressure.  <img src='http://www.annaraccoon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Raccoon</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11404</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Raccoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11404</guid>
		<description>Huh! Oh ye of little faith, &#039;tis not I who is technically incompetent, &#039;tis not I who wrote t&#039;article above, &#039;tis I who have got my banner back in place which no less than two &#039;web experts&#039; have told me is not possible without a complete redesign in the past week.....step forward Master Ward.

Er, whoops! T&#039;was I who managed to lose the banner in the last upgrade, so perhaps I had better stop crowing.

Slinks away into corner, shamefaced. 

Anybody out there capable of drawing me a better Raccoon than that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh! Oh ye of little faith, &#8217;tis not I who is technically incompetent, &#8217;tis not I who wrote t&#8217;article above, &#8217;tis I who have got my banner back in place which no less than two &#8216;web experts&#8217; have told me is not possible without a complete redesign in the past week&#8230;..step forward Master Ward.</p>
<p>Er, whoops! T&#8217;was I who managed to lose the banner in the last upgrade, so perhaps I had better stop crowing.</p>
<p>Slinks away into corner, shamefaced. </p>
<p>Anybody out there capable of drawing me a better Raccoon than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11403</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11403</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s free so you get what you pay for.

That being said I have never trusted web based apps because they are not under your control.  I have all e-mails directly accessible on my computer for the last 2 years.  If I need anything before that I just get out the backup CD.

Now, since I am posting more than the odd comment on some blogs, I&#039;m investigating ways of archiving those as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s free so you get what you pay for.</p>
<p>That being said I have never trusted web based apps because they are not under your control.  I have all e-mails directly accessible on my computer for the last 2 years.  If I need anything before that I just get out the backup CD.</p>
<p>Now, since I am posting more than the odd comment on some blogs, I&#8217;m investigating ways of archiving those as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allegoricus</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11402</link>
		<dc:creator>Allegoricus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11402</guid>
		<description>&quot;It therefore follows that you can do what amounts to taking backups.&quot;

Which also means - and sorry for this - that anything you lose from those lists is your own fault.   :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It therefore follows that you can do what amounts to taking backups.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which also means &#8211; and sorry for this &#8211; that anything you lose from those lists is your own fault.   <img src='http://www.annaraccoon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allegoricus</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11401</link>
		<dc:creator>Allegoricus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11401</guid>
		<description>Puzzling - I&#039;ve been using gmail since 2004 and it just ... works.
I manage mailing lists from a couple of gmail mailboxes too - you know you can import and export [1] contact lists, don&#039;t you?

[1] It therefore follows that you can do what amounts to taking backups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puzzling &#8211; I&#8217;ve been using gmail since 2004 and it just &#8230; works.<br />
I manage mailing lists from a couple of gmail mailboxes too &#8211; you know you can import and export [1] contact lists, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>[1] It therefore follows that you can do what amounts to taking backups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnsley Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.annaraccoon.com/internet/last-remaining-incandescent-rosbif-writes/comment-page-1/#comment-11400</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnsley Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annaraccoon.com/?p=5054#comment-11400</guid>
		<description>I share your pain Ms Raccoon, just as well googlemail is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your pain Ms Raccoon, just as well googlemail is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
